[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <l0oiea$jo6$2@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 01:53:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 08/27] bonding: remove
bond_for_each_slave_reverse()
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 at 20:57 GMT, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com> wrote:
> We only use it in rollback scenarios and can easily use the standart
> bond_for_each_dev() instead.
>
What you remove actually is bond_for_each_slave_continue_reverse()...
$subject needs to be fixed.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> index c3dcc6b..46f6b40 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> @@ -1246,9 +1246,9 @@ static int alb_handle_addr_collision_on_attach(struct bonding *bond, struct slav
> */
> static int alb_set_mac_address(struct bonding *bond, void *addr)
> {
> - char tmp_addr[ETH_ALEN];
> - struct slave *slave;
> + struct slave *slave, *rollback_slave;
> struct sockaddr sa;
> + char tmp_addr[ETH_ALEN];
Why are you moving tmp_addr[]?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists