[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130923.141723.230027899643613700.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:17:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/11] sfc: Add static tracepoints to datapath
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:51:07 +0100
> 2. Generic trace events would be subject to changes that could make them
> unsuitable for Solarflare's tests.
This is not an argument for doing things privately in your driver and
duplicating things.
We should make a facility that's useful to Solarflare _AS WELL AS_
everyone else.
> 4. Static tracepoints always have run-time overhead, so these should
> probably be controlled by a kconfig option (as in this patch).
Don't we use static branches and other tricks to make them close to zero
overhead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists