[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD012F306@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:42:05 +0000
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: "xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] xen-netback: handle IPv6 TCP GSO
packets from the guest
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.liu2@...rix.com]
> Sent: 08 October 2013 14:32
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Wei Liu; David Vrabel;
> Ian Campbell
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] xen-netback: handle IPv6 TCP GSO
> packets from the guest
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:58:15AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > This patch a xenstore flag, festure-gso-tcpv6, to adevrtise netback can
> ^ adds feature advertise
>
> > handle IPv6 TCP GSO packets and creates SKB_GSO_TCPV6 skbs if the
> frontend
> > passes an extra segment with the new type XEN_NETIF_GSO_TYPE_TCPV6
> added to
> > netif.h.
>
> Note the new type should be synced to Xen's netif.h tree with separate
> patch for Xen.
>
Ok. Do you think it is reasonable to make incremental changes to netif.h in this series and then submit a patch to xen-devel with the complete set once this series is accepted?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists