[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <525429BD02000078000F99F6@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:50:21 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Paul Durrant" <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
Cc: "David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] xen-netback: handle
IPv6 TCP GSO packets from the guest
>>> On 08.10.13 at 15:42, Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.liu2@...rix.com]
>> Sent: 08 October 2013 14:32
>> To: Paul Durrant
>> Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Wei Liu; David Vrabel;
>> Ian Campbell
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] xen-netback: handle IPv6 TCP GSO
>> packets from the guest
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:58:15AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> > This patch a xenstore flag, festure-gso-tcpv6, to adevrtise netback can
>> ^ adds feature advertise
>>
>> > handle IPv6 TCP GSO packets and creates SKB_GSO_TCPV6 skbs if the
>> frontend
>> > passes an extra segment with the new type XEN_NETIF_GSO_TYPE_TCPV6
>> added to
>> > netif.h.
>>
>> Note the new type should be synced to Xen's netif.h tree with separate
>> patch for Xen.
>>
>
> Ok. Do you think it is reasonable to make incremental changes to netif.h in
> this series and then submit a patch to xen-devel with the complete set once
> this series is accepted?
I would think so.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists