[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131018144618.GL2596@neomailbox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:46:18 +0200
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...hcoding.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...n-mesh.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding
the skb
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:32:09AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 07:35 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:10:41PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:28:57AM -0700, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]
> >
> > The problem I was having was due to an skb entering br0 first and br1 later.
> > When reaching br1 skb->nf_bridge was != NULL because of the previous processing
> > in br0.
> >
>
> Doesn't br_nf_pre_routing already take care of this for you? It will
> drop the ref on the current nf_bridge and allocate a new one. Is that
> not sufficient?
In my case that line is not reached because
700 if (!IS_IP(skb) && !IS_VLAN_IP(skb) && !IS_PPPOE_IP(skb))
is always true: the packet getting analysed is a batman-adv encapsulated packet,
which does not match any of the three above.
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists