[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526154B2.2060900@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:33:06 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...hcoding.com>
CC: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...n-mesh.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding
the skb
On 10/18/2013 10:46 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:32:09AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> On 10/18/2013 07:35 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:10:41PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:37:35PM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:28:57AM -0700, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> The problem I was having was due to an skb entering br0 first and br1 later.
>>> When reaching br1 skb->nf_bridge was != NULL because of the previous processing
>>> in br0.
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't br_nf_pre_routing already take care of this for you? It will
>> drop the ref on the current nf_bridge and allocate a new one. Is that
>> not sufficient?
>
> In my case that line is not reached because
>
> 700 if (!IS_IP(skb) && !IS_VLAN_IP(skb) && !IS_PPPOE_IP(skb))
>
> is always true: the packet getting analysed is a batman-adv encapsulated packet,
> which does not match any of the three above.
>
> Cheers,
>
Looking at other encapsulators (PPP, iptunnel, VXLAN), they do
nf_reset() on input. Would that be appropriate for batman as well?
-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists