netdev - Re: 16% regression on 10G caused by TCP small queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131027043351.GA27876@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Date:	Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:33:52 -0700
From:	Dave Taht <dave.taht@...ferbloat.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	stephen@...workplumber.org, ncardwell@...gle.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 16% regression on 10G caused by TCP small queues

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 03:01:21AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:45:57 -0700
> 
> > Sorry, thought sk_pacing_rate depended on FQ qdisc but it is other way around.
> > In which case doing merge of these two was sufficient to fix the problem.
> > With a minor manual fix up to tcp.h.
> 
> I know, I already have a half-built tree of -stable submissions
> that does exactlty this.

I know that the "fq" qdisc is not exactly a -stable thing, but if it's simpler
to include it rather than sort through the patch sets, I'm all for it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html