| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <526F4959.8080501@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:36:25 +0800
From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <maloy@...jonn.com>,
<jon.maloy@...csson.com>
CC: <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, <erik.hugne@...csson.com>,
<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tipc: message reassembly using fragment
chain
On 10/29/2013 11:49 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:56:56 +0800
>
>> Therefore, the best method is to divide tipc_recv_msg() into several
>> smaller functions to simplify the current implementation. But it's not
>> an easy job. Actually I ever tried to do it, but I gave up lastly
>> because I did not find one perfect solution about how to divide it.
>
> But you're going to have to find a way, this indent level is out of
> control.
>
>
By simply adjusting the order of branch blocks, this is what I can figure out the simplest
method to resolve the issue now :)
Please review below change. If it's fine, I will send one formal patch.
(Below change still follows original code logic)
diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index 12c72d2..6c88dbc 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -1592,97 +1592,94 @@ void tipc_recv_msg(struct sk_buff *head, struct tipc_bearer *b_ptr)
/* Now (finally!) process the incoming message */
protocol_check:
- if (likely(link_working_working(l_ptr))) {
- if (likely(seq_no == mod(l_ptr->next_in_no))) {
- l_ptr->next_in_no++;
- if (unlikely(l_ptr->oldest_deferred_in))
- head = link_insert_deferred_queue(l_ptr,
- head);
-deliver:
- if (likely(msg_isdata(msg))) {
- tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
- tipc_port_recv_msg(buf);
- continue;
- }
- switch (msg_user(msg)) {
- int ret;
- case MSG_BUNDLER:
- l_ptr->stats.recv_bundles++;
- l_ptr->stats.recv_bundled +=
- msg_msgcnt(msg);
- tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
- tipc_link_recv_bundle(buf);
- continue;
- case NAME_DISTRIBUTOR:
- n_ptr->bclink.recv_permitted = true;
- tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
- tipc_named_recv(buf);
- continue;
- case BCAST_PROTOCOL:
- tipc_link_recv_sync(n_ptr, buf);
- tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
- continue;
- case CONN_MANAGER:
- tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
- tipc_port_recv_proto_msg(buf);
- continue;
- case MSG_FRAGMENTER:
- l_ptr->stats.recv_fragments++;
- ret = tipc_link_recv_fragment(
- &l_ptr->defragm_buf,
- &buf, &msg);
- if (ret == 1) {
- l_ptr->stats.recv_fragmented++;
- goto deliver;
- }
- if (ret == -1)
- l_ptr->next_in_no--;
- break;
- case CHANGEOVER_PROTOCOL:
- type = msg_type(msg);
- if (link_recv_changeover_msg(&l_ptr,
- &buf)) {
- msg = buf_msg(buf);
- seq_no = msg_seqno(msg);
- if (type == ORIGINAL_MSG)
- goto deliver;
- goto protocol_check;
- }
- break;
- default:
- kfree_skb(buf);
- buf = NULL;
- break;
- }
+ if (unlikely(!link_working_working(l_ptr))) {
+ if (msg_user(msg) == LINK_PROTOCOL) {
+ link_recv_proto_msg(l_ptr, buf);
+ head = link_insert_deferred_queue(l_ptr, head);
+ tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Traffic message. Conditionally activate link */
+ link_state_event(l_ptr, TRAFFIC_MSG_EVT);
+
+ if (link_working_working(l_ptr)) {
+ /* Re-insert buffer in front of queue */
+ buf->next = head;
+ head = buf;
tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
- tipc_net_route_msg(buf);
continue;
}
+ tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
+ goto cont;
+ }
+
+ /* Link is now in state WORKING_WORKING */
+ if (unlikely(seq_no != mod(l_ptr->next_in_no))) {
link_handle_out_of_seq_msg(l_ptr, buf);
head = link_insert_deferred_queue(l_ptr, head);
tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
continue;
}
-
- /* Link is not in state WORKING_WORKING */
- if (msg_user(msg) == LINK_PROTOCOL) {
- link_recv_proto_msg(l_ptr, buf);
+ l_ptr->next_in_no++;
+ if (unlikely(l_ptr->oldest_deferred_in))
head = link_insert_deferred_queue(l_ptr, head);
+deliver:
+ if (likely(msg_isdata(msg))) {
tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
+ tipc_port_recv_msg(buf);
continue;
}
-
- /* Traffic message. Conditionally activate link */
- link_state_event(l_ptr, TRAFFIC_MSG_EVT);
-
- if (link_working_working(l_ptr)) {
- /* Re-insert buffer in front of queue */
- buf->next = head;
- head = buf;
+ switch (msg_user(msg)) {
+ int ret;
+ case MSG_BUNDLER:
+ l_ptr->stats.recv_bundles++;
+ l_ptr->stats.recv_bundled += msg_msgcnt(msg);
+ tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
+ tipc_link_recv_bundle(buf);
+ continue;
+ case NAME_DISTRIBUTOR:
+ n_ptr->bclink.recv_permitted = true;
+ tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
+ tipc_named_recv(buf);
+ continue;
+ case BCAST_PROTOCOL:
+ tipc_link_recv_sync(n_ptr, buf);
+ tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
+ continue;
+ case CONN_MANAGER:
tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
+ tipc_port_recv_proto_msg(buf);
continue;
+ case MSG_FRAGMENTER:
+ l_ptr->stats.recv_fragments++;
+ ret = tipc_link_recv_fragment(&l_ptr->defragm_buf,
+ &buf, &msg);
+ if (ret == 1) {
+ l_ptr->stats.recv_fragmented++;
+ goto deliver;
+ }
+ if (ret == -1)
+ l_ptr->next_in_no--;
+ break;
+ case CHANGEOVER_PROTOCOL:
+ type = msg_type(msg);
+ if (link_recv_changeover_msg(&l_ptr, &buf)) {
+ msg = buf_msg(buf);
+ seq_no = msg_seqno(msg);
+ if (type == ORIGINAL_MSG)
+ goto deliver;
+ goto protocol_check;
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ kfree_skb(buf);
+ buf = NULL;
+ break;
}
tipc_node_unlock(n_ptr);
+ tipc_net_route_msg(buf);
+ continue;
cont:
kfree_skb(buf);
}
Regards,
Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists