[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131029124010.GA15762@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:40:10 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jiri@...nulli.us,
vyasevich@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
thaller@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] ipv6: allow userspace to create address with IFLA_F_TEMPORARY flag
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:37:06AM -0000, David Laight wrote:
> > Note that you don't even need to put the DHCP protocol core into the
> > kernel to fix the promiscuous problem. You just have to use the
> > current kernel interfaces correctly.
> >
> > It used to be the case a very long time ago that you couldn't even
> > receive broadcast UDP datagrams on a socket until an address was
> > configured on it.
> >
> > So everyone turns on promiscuous mode and uses RAW sockets or
> > AF_PACKET.
> >
> > Stupid? yes.
>
> Not only that, but the dhcp client could use a normal UDP socket
> to keep the lease renewed - I suspect it has only ever needed
> to use the BPF interface (I didn't think it set promiscuous)
> when acquiring the initial lease.
Yes, this is a very unfortunate situation. From my experience it is not that
easy to get a patch merged into isc-dhcp.
It seems not that invasive to switch from af_packet to an udp socket with
SO_BROADCAST set.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists