[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131105160838.GH8832@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:08:38 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...t-bretagne.fr>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] ipv6: enable IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MGR for getsockopt
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:28:56PM +0100, Florent Fourcot wrote:
> + spin_lock_bh(&ip6_fl_lock);
> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
> +
> + for_each_sk_fl_rcu(np, sfl) {
> + if (sfl->fl->label == (np->flow_label & IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK)) {
The iteration is protected by rcu, so need to take the ip6_fl_lock. We should
lock the smallest region which needs to be protected. This is only the body of
the if.
Using fl->label without lock is fine, because it is immutable after interning.
> + freq->flr_label = sfl->fl->label;
> + freq->flr_dst = sfl->fl->dst;
> + freq->flr_share = sfl->fl->share;
> + freq->flr_expires = (sfl->fl->expires - jiffies) / HZ;
> + freq->flr_linger = sfl->fl->linger / HZ;
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ip6_fl_lock);
Please reverse these two lines then.
Could you take a look at your patch regarding fl6_renew, too? Can we
push locking into the function there, too?
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists