[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131112230242.GA1643@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:02:42 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the net-next
tree
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:55:29AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> As per Hannes' suggestion, the result should look like (see cover
> letter in [1]):
>
> if (r->entropy_total > 128) {
> r->initialized = 1;
> r->entropy_total = 0;
> if (r == &nonblocking_pool) {
> prandom_reseed_late();
> pr_notice("random: %s pool is initialized\n",
> r->name);
> }
> }
Agreed. What's the schedule for pushing net-dev to Linus? I'm
currently at Korea Linux Forum, and I was originally planning on
pushing random.git to Linus sometime today, but I'm also willing to
wait for net-dev to go first. Either way, we should make sure Linus
is aware of the agreed-upon resolution of the merge conflict.
Cheers,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists