netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/10] bonding: create bond_first_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5281D0D0.9040704@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:55:12 +0800
From:	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
CC:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/10] bonding: create bond_first_slave_rcu()

On 2013/11/11 20:59, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:36:41PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> The bond_first_slave_rcu() will be used to instead of bond_first_slave()
>> in rcu_read_lock().
>>
>> So move the struct netdev_adjacent to the netdevice.h and make the
>> bond_first_slave_rcu() could use the struct.
> 
> The whole point in netdev_adjacent functions was to hide it from the users
> who wanted to use it directly. See
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg248026.html
> 
> for reference. Please try to avoid that.
> 
Hi, Veaceslav
following the point, I rebuild the bond_first_slave_rcu(),
if you have no comments, I will move it in the patch set.

Regards
Ding

+/* Caller must have rcu_read_lock */
+#define bond_first_slave_rcu(bond) \
+       netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu(bond->dev)
+
 #define bond_is_first_slave(bond, pos) (pos == bond_first_slave(bond))
 #define bond_is_last_slave(bond, pos) (pos == bond_last_slave(bond))

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 15fa01c..abfcfad 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -2869,6 +2869,7 @@ void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
             priv = netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(dev, &(iter)))

 void *netdev_adjacent_get_private(struct list_head *adj_list);
+void *netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
 struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev);
 struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
 int netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *upper_dev);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 8ffc52e..39bc202 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4570,6 +4570,27 @@ void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu);

 /**
+ * netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu - Get the first ->private from the
+ *                                    lower neighbour list, RCU
+ *                                    variant
+ * @dev: device
+ *
+ * Gets the first netdev_adjacent->private from the dev's lower neighbour
+ * list. The caller must hold RCU read lock.
+ */
+void *netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+       struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+       lower = list_first_or_null_rcu(&dev->adj_list.lower,
+                       struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+       if (lower)
+               return lower->private;
+       return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu);





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html