netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:22:18 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Luciano Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate
 structure

* Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org> [131114 15:04]:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51:33AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > If this is not going into v3.13, these will cause conflicts
> > with the mach-omap2/board-*.c files for v3.14.
> > 
> > So it might be best to do a minimal header patch first that
> > can be merged in by both linux-omap and wireless trees.
> 
> I guess this patch is pretty minimal. It also seems to be acked by
> the involved Maintainers, so maybe just merge Patch 1 without the
> other patches?
> 
> This does not solve the problem with the struct modification from
> the second patch, but I guess it's the more intrusive patch.

Once at least the first two patches are ready, how about I queue
them after -rc1 and set up an immutable branch that can be merged
in by linux-omap tree and the wireless tree?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html