[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131114230330.GB6383@earth.universe>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:03:33 +0000
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Luciano Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate
structure
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51:33AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> [...]
>
> If this is not going into v3.13, these will cause conflicts
> with the mach-omap2/board-*.c files for v3.14.
>
> So it might be best to do a minimal header patch first that
> can be merged in by both linux-omap and wireless trees.
I guess this patch is pretty minimal. It also seems to be acked by
the involved Maintainers, so maybe just merge Patch 1 without the
other patches?
This does not solve the problem with the struct modification from
the second patch, but I guess it's the more intrusive patch.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists