[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131115210520.GA16722@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:05:20 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
shemminger@...workplumber.org, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: seed random_int_secret at least poorly at
core_initcall time
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:33:04AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> When the static stack canary was mentioned during the ARM summit, I
> dug around a little bit and saw that at very early boot, yes, it was
> always the same, but after boot finished, it was different from boot
> to boot. I didn't get far enough to figure out what was changing it
> later on.
I've been in Seoul this past week, so I haven't had a chance look more
closely at this, but what's not clear to me what the impact will be of
having a static statck canary during early boot. Does that mean the
stack canary for the certain kernel threads and the pid 1 are always
constant, since their stacks are getting set up before we're actually
able to initialize the stack canary with something random?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists