Message-ID: <528AFF69.5020603@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:04:25 +0800
From:	Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
CC:	<davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <brouer@...hat.com>, <jpirko@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] net: sched: tbf: fix calculation of max_size

On 2013/11/18 20:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:39:23 +0800
> Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
>> commit b757c9336d63f94c6b57532(tbf: improved accuracy at high rates)
>> introduce a regression.
>>
>> With the follow command:
>> tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: tbf latency 50ms burst 10KB rate 30gbit mtu 64k
>>
>> Without this patch, the max_size value is 10751(bytes).
>> But, in fact, the real max_size value should be smaller than 7440(bytes).
>> Or a packet whose length is bigger than 7440 will cause network congestion.
>> Because the packet is so big that can't get enough tokens. Even all the tokens
>> in the buffer is given to the packet.
>>
>> With this patch, the max_size value is 7440(bytes).
>> The packets whose length is bigger than 7440(bytes) will be dropped or reshape
>> in tbf_enqueue().
> 
> 
> I acknowledge that TBF seems to have some dependencies to the
> userspace constructed rate table (which we do NOT use anymore in the
> kernel).  And that these should be fixed.
> 
> But I'm not sure that your patch is the best solution... and the patch
> also contains some issues, see inlined comments.
> 
> The main annoying problem is *again* how the rate table system got
> removed, in the kernel, but nobody fixed userspace.
> 
> 
> So, the main problem is that qopt->buffer (send from userspace/tc) is
> in a "time-format" (user input "burst" in bytes).  Which used-to, make
> sense because the rate table used the same "time-format".
> 
> Now you are reversing this calculation of "q->buffer" (token burst)
> back into bytes, so we can choose "max_size" (to avoid a problem in
> tbf_dequeue()).
> 
> I don't like this converting back-and-forth, I'm worried about
> rounding errors.
> 
> The easiest "hack" solution would be:
> 
>  for (n = 0; n < 65535; n++)
>      if (psched_l2t_ns(&qopt->rate, n) > q->buffer)
>          break;
>  max_size = n;
> 
> Unfortunately we have to keep backward compat with iproute2/tc, but
> IMHO it would be a lot easier, if we could fix userspace, and remove
> all the length-to-time calculations, as they should now be the
> responsibility of the kernel.  Well, wishful thinking...
> 
> 
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  include/net/sch_generic.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  net/sched/sch_tbf.c       | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> index d0a6321..8da64f3 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> @@ -701,6 +701,52 @@ static inline u64 psched_l2t_ns(const struct psched_ratecfg *r,
>>  	return ((u64)len * r->mult) >> r->shift;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Time to Length, convert time in ns to length in bytes
>> + * to determinate how many bytes can be sent in given time.
>> + */
>> +static inline u64 psched_ns_t2l(const struct psched_ratecfg *r,
>> +				u64 time_in_ns)
>> +{
>> +	u64 len = time_in_ns;
>> +	u8 shift = r->shift;
>> +	bool is_div = false;
>> +
>> +	/* The formula is :
>> +	 * len = (time_in_ns << shift) / mult
>> +	 * when time_in_ns does shift, it would overflow.
>> +	 * If overflow happens first time, do division.
>> +	 * Then do shift. If it happens again,
>> +	 * set lenth to ~0ULL.
>> +	 */
>> +	while (shift) {
>> +		if (len & (1ULL << 63)) {
>> +			if (!is_div) {
>> +				len = div64_u64(len, r->mult);
>> +				is_div = true;
>> +			} else {
>> +				/* overflow happens */
>> +				len = ~0ULL;
>> +				is_div = true;
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +		len <<= 1;
>> +		shift--;
>> +	}
>> +	if (!is_div)
>> +		len = div64_u64(len, r->mult);
>> +
>> +	if (unlikely(r->linklayer == TC_LINKLAYER_ATM))
>> +		len = (len / 53) * 48;
>> +
>> +	if (len > r->overhead)
>> +		len -= r->overhead;
>> +	else
>> +		len = 0;
>> +
>> +	return len;
>> +}
>> +
> 
> Are we 100% sure, that the conversion is accurate between
> psched_l2t_ns() and psched_ns_t2l for all possible rates.
> 
> E.g. why is it that r->shift have to be recalculate (orig created in
> psched_ratecfg_precompute()).

It don't recalculate r->shift, it just do shift bit by bit in case that
len overflows. If len overflows, set it to ~0ULL.
I would like to use the way you suggest to calculate the max_size.
So forget about this function.:)

> 
> 
>>  void psched_ratecfg_precompute(struct psched_ratecfg *r,
>>  			       const struct tc_ratespec *conf,
>>  			       u64 rate64);
>> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_tbf.c b/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
>> index 68f9859..eb9ce7b 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
>> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int tbf_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt)
>>  	struct qdisc_rate_table *rtab = NULL;
>>  	struct qdisc_rate_table *ptab = NULL;
>>  	struct Qdisc *child = NULL;
>> -	int max_size, n;
>> +	u32 max_size = 0;
>>  	u64 rate64 = 0, prate64 = 0;
>>  
>>  	err = nla_parse_nested(tb, TCA_TBF_MAX, opt, tbf_policy);
>> @@ -291,33 +291,20 @@ static int tbf_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt)
>>  		goto done;
>>  
>>  	qopt = nla_data(tb[TCA_TBF_PARMS]);
>> -	rtab = qdisc_get_rtab(&qopt->rate, tb[TCA_TBF_RTAB]);
>> -	if (rtab == NULL)
>> -		goto done;
>> -
>> -	if (qopt->peakrate.rate) {
>> -		if (qopt->peakrate.rate > qopt->rate.rate)
>> -			ptab = qdisc_get_rtab(&qopt->peakrate, tb[TCA_TBF_PTAB]);
>> -		if (ptab == NULL)
>> -			goto done;
>> +	if (qopt->rate.linklayer == TC_LINKLAYER_UNAWARE) {
>> +		rtab = qdisc_get_rtab(&qopt->rate, tb[TCA_TBF_RTAB]);
>> +		if (rtab) {
>> +			qdisc_put_rtab(rtab);
>> +			rtab = NULL;
>> +		}
> 
> This is correct code construct, for backward compatible reading of the
> rate table.
> 
> But, notice how your free this at once, which means you also should
> cleanup the exit/done: section.

Agreed, I will change it in v3.
Thanks!

> 
> 
> 
>>  	}
>> -
>> -	for (n = 0; n < 256; n++)
>> -		if (rtab->data[n] > qopt->buffer)
>> -			break;
>> -	max_size = (n << qopt->rate.cell_log) - 1;
> 
> This is here we could do the quick-and-dirty solution:
> 
>  for (n = 0; n < 65535; n++)
>      if (psched_l2t_ns(&qopt->rate, n) > q->buffer)
>          break;
>  max_size = n;
> 
> 
> 
>> -	if (ptab) {
>> -		int size;
>> -
>> -		for (n = 0; n < 256; n++)
>> -			if (ptab->data[n] > qopt->mtu)
>> -				break;
>> -		size = (n << qopt->peakrate.cell_log) - 1;
>> -		if (size < max_size)
>> -			max_size = size;
>> +	if (qopt->peakrate.linklayer == TC_LINKLAYER_UNAWARE) {
>> +		ptab = qdisc_get_rtab(&qopt->peakrate, tb[TCA_TBF_PTAB]);
>> +		if (ptab) {
>> +			qdisc_put_rtab(ptab);
>> +			ptab = NULL;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>> -	if (max_size < 0)
>> -		goto done;
>>  
>>  	if (q->qdisc != &noop_qdisc) {
>>  		err = fifo_set_limit(q->qdisc, qopt->limit);
>> @@ -339,25 +326,45 @@ static int tbf_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt)
>>  	}
>>  	q->limit = qopt->limit;
>>  	q->mtu = PSCHED_TICKS2NS(qopt->mtu);
>> -	q->max_size = max_size;
>>  	q->buffer = PSCHED_TICKS2NS(qopt->buffer);
>>  	q->tokens = q->buffer;
>>  	q->ptokens = q->mtu;
>>  
>>  	if (tb[TCA_TBF_RATE64])
>>  		rate64 = nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_TBF_RATE64]);
>> -	psched_ratecfg_precompute(&q->rate, &rtab->rate, rate64);
>> -	if (ptab) {
>> +	psched_ratecfg_precompute(&q->rate, &qopt->rate, rate64);
>> +	if (!q->rate.rate_bytes_ps)
>> +		goto unlock_done;
>> +	max_size = min_t(u64, psched_ns_t2l(&q->rate, q->buffer), ~0);
>> +	max_size = min_t(u32, max_size, (256 << qopt->rate.cell_log) - 1);
> 
> The rate system and the rate.cell_log is not really used anymore, so
> its a bit strange to use it.  Perhaps it's even a bug to base a
> calculation on this.

cell_log is calculated from mtu(user input in bytes) in userspace.
In the old calculation, max_size should be smaller than (256 << cell_log)
which means it's smaller than mtu.

> 
>> +
>> +	if (qopt->peakrate.rate) {
>> +		u64 size = 0;
>>  		if (tb[TCA_TBF_PRATE64])
>>  			prate64 = nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_TBF_PRATE64]);
>> -		psched_ratecfg_precompute(&q->peak, &ptab->rate, prate64);
>> +		psched_ratecfg_precompute(&q->peak, &qopt->peakrate, prate64);
>> +		size = psched_ns_t2l(&q->peak, q->mtu);
>> +		max_size = min_t(u64, max_size, size);
>> +		max_size = min_t(u32,
>> +				 max_size,
>> +				 (256 << qopt->peakrate.cell_log) - 1);
>>  		q->peak_present = true;
>>  	} else {
>>  		q->peak_present = false;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (!max_size)
>> +		goto unlock_done;
>> +	q->max_size = max_size;
>> +
>>  	sch_tree_unlock(sch);
>>  	err = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (0) {
> 
> I really dislike this construct.  I'm afraid what a dumb compile would
> optimized this to.

OK, change it in v3.
Thanks!

> 
>> +unlock_done:
>> +		sch_tree_unlock(sch);
>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>>  done:
>>  	if (rtab)
>>  		qdisc_put_rtab(rtab);
> 
> This could be cleaned up, as we already have released the rtab's.
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists