netdev - Re: [PATCH linux-next] hisax: disable build for big-endian arm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <528F0B80.9020900@linux-pingi.de>
Date:	Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:45:04 +0100
From:	Karsten Keil <kkeil@...ux-pingi.de>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:	Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@...oste.net>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] hisax: disable build for big-endian arm

Am 22.11.2013 08:29, schrieb Takashi Iwai:
> At Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:49:54 +0100,
> Vincent Stehlé wrote:
>>
>> Teles PCI and HFC PCI-bus refuse to build on big-endian ARM; disable them in
>> Kconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@...oste.net>
>> Cc: Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This can be seen on e.g. linux next-20131121 with arm allyesconfig.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> V.
>>
>>  drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig b/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig
>> index d9edcc9..53dbb75 100644
>> --- a/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/isdn/hisax/Kconfig
>> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ config HISAX_16_3
>>  
>>  config HISAX_TELESPCI
>>  	bool "Teles PCI"
>> -	depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(SPARC || PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN)))
>> +	depends on PCI && (BROKEN || !(SPARC || PPC || PARISC || M68K || (MIPS && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || FRV || (XTENSA && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) || (ARM && !CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN)))
> 
> Isn't it a bit better to exclude CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN globally?
> 
> 	depends on PCI && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN && (BROKEN || !(SPARC || PPC || PARISC || M68K || MIPS || FRV || XTENSA || ARM))
> 
> Or maybe just
> 
> 	depends on PCI && (X86 || BROKEN)
> 
> (Alpha?  Can anyone test? :)

I never got this card so it was never in my tests, if I remember
correctely  somebody had it running with Alpha before 2000.
And yes I'm fine if we simplify this mess to only X86.

Karsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html