[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A19C86.8030007@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:44:38 +0800
From: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
<jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] unix: convert printks to pr_<level>
On 2013/12/6 17:40, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 10:32 AM, Wang Weidong wrote:
>> On 2013/12/6 17:22, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 12/06/2013 07:09 AM, Wang Weidong wrote:
>>>> use pr_<level> instead of printk(LEVEL)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/unix/af_unix.c | 10 ++++++----
>>>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>>>> index 4155ed3..ca98e61 100644
>>>> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
>>>> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
>>>> @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@
>>>> * with BSD names.
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>>>> +#define DEBUG
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Why do you define DEBUG here ?
>>>
>> I think the pr_debug != printk(KERN_DEBUG), equal when define DEBUG.
>
> Ok, then please read Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt
>
> pr_debug() is part of the dynamic debugging framework and
> can be enabled / disabled at runtime when configured. So
> that define does not belong here.
>
Yes, You are right. I will fix it.
Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists