netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: introduce SO_BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131206.121004.406077340286411332.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:10:04 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, sekletar.m@...il.com, dborkman@...hat.com,
	msekleta@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: introduce SO_BPF_EXTENSIONS

From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:50:49 -0000

>> if SO_BPF_EXTENSIONS is supported, than you can assume that all current
>> extensions are supported.
>> 
>> No need to consume one bit per feature, as all these features wont ever
>> disappear from linux.
> 
> However one of the BSDs could add a subset of the features and
> wish to advertise the fact.
> So using extra flags for non-trivial extensions could be useful.

Sorry, we're not going to accomodate this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html