netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: introduce SO_BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131206.121523.75881126286614298.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:15:23 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Cc:	dborkman@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, sekletar.m@...il.com,
	msekleta@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: introduce SO_BPF_EXTENSIONS

From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:15:58 -0000

>>   i) Does BSD have such extensions and if so do we overlap some?
>> 
>> ii) Is it planned to also introduce SO_BPF_EXTENSIONS for BSD kernels
>>      to have one common api (that i.e. libpcap would then make use of)?
> 
> If it is useful to add any of the extensions, and they don't collide
> with any other existing changes, then they might be added.
> Adding a request that indicates which extensions are supported should
> be easier than adding the extensions themselves.
> Adding all the Linux extensions at once could be problematic.

Again, we're not going to accomodate this, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html