[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ7VeQz67Q2HSMd-AP7MApaFWe8z6bERFGzH-PqLak1KK77sGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:09:23 +0100
From: Michal Sekletár <sekletar.m@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: David.Laight@...lab.com, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: introduce SO_BPF_EXTENSIONS
Not sure I follow. Not going to accommodate, meaning at all or you
just my original approach? If later applies, I'll be happy to rewrite
the patch.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:15 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:15:58 -0000
>
>>> i) Does BSD have such extensions and if so do we overlap some?
>>>
>>> ii) Is it planned to also introduce SO_BPF_EXTENSIONS for BSD kernels
>>> to have one common api (that i.e. libpcap would then make use of)?
>>
>> If it is useful to add any of the extensions, and they don't collide
>> with any other existing changes, then they might be added.
>> Adding a request that indicates which extensions are supported should
>> be easier than adding the extensions themselves.
>> Adding all the Linux extensions at once could be problematic.
>
> Again, we're not going to accomodate this, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists