netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] pktgen IPsec support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52A67C2B.2030508@windriver.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:27:55 +0800
From:	Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] pktgen IPsec support



On 2013年12月10日 10:09, David Miller wrote:
> From: Fan Du<fan.du@...driver.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:02:36 +0800
>
>> Can I just reply to custom "Yes, wrong checksum value and
>> non-decrypted packet
>> is not big deal when your peer host receiving them"?
>
> It's a packet spamming tool, take that into consideration.
> Regardless of what you may think, it is simply the case that you can't
> just remove something because you perceive it as not useful to anyone.
>
> This goes doubly for something exposed to users for a decade.
>
> Please change your patch series to retain the feature.

I will restore "wrong checksum/len packet" behavior as a default behavior,
As a matter of fact this has nothing to do with Patch1/5 which removes codes.
And then making enhanced feature as optional for user who expects good format packet

Is this fine for you, finally?


> Thanks.
>
>

-- 
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑

--fan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html