netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] pktgen IPsec support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131210.004946.994121183512258929.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:49:46 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	fan.du@...driver.com
Cc:	steffen.klassert@...unet.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] pktgen IPsec support

From: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:27:55 +0800

> 
> 
> On 2013年12月10日 10:09, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Fan Du<fan.du@...driver.com>
>> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:02:36 +0800
>>
>>> Can I just reply to custom "Yes, wrong checksum value and
>>> non-decrypted packet
>>> is not big deal when your peer host receiving them"?
>>
>> It's a packet spamming tool, take that into consideration.
>> Regardless of what you may think, it is simply the case that you can't
>> just remove something because you perceive it as not useful to anyone.
>>
>> This goes doubly for something exposed to users for a decade.
>>
>> Please change your patch series to retain the feature.
> 
> I will restore "wrong checksum/len packet" behavior as a default
> behavior,
> As a matter of fact this has nothing to do with Patch1/5 which removes
> codes.
> And then making enhanced feature as optional for user who expects good
> format packet
> 
> Is this fine for you, finally?

Sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html