[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386755270.30271.5.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:47:50 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v5] xen-netback: fix fragment detection
in checksum setup
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 09:12 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 16:24 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
>
> > Yes, I guess that's true but if we decide to pull up at all then is it harmful to pull more than we absolutely need?
>
> Pulling too many bytes might hurt aggregation.
>
> When one skb is merged to another one (skb_try_coalesce()), if you have
> payload in skb->head, we cannot free the head, and need one additional
> 'frag'
Does that ever happen to skb's which are received by a NIC and passed up
to the network stack (including forwarding by bridging of netfilter)? I
thought this path only happened for locally generated traffic.
If it can happen for received skb's then that seems like a pretty solid
reason not to over estimate in the pull up phase.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists