netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] net: pkt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131211.145622.877928141690222897.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:56:22 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	subramanian.vijay@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vijaynsu@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] net: pkt_sched: PIE AQM scheme

From: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:33:08 -0800

> This patch seems to have been rejected. Can you clarify if this is due
> to apparent issue with IETF disclosure statement for PIE?
> If so, can you please specify what the criteria will be for you to
> reconsider this patch for inclusion?

The intellectual property issue has not been resolved as far as I am
aware, and nobody seems to want to take an official stand on that
issue so I refuse to even consider the patch.

In fact, the last time I was CC:'d on private correspondance on this
matter, people on Cisco's end seemed irritated that they were still
being asked about it.  That's not acceptable.

That attitude has to change, because this issue is just as important
as the correctness of the code for inclusion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html