netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: remove a bogus TSO split

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADVnQynu9kbaqMW+eTMsp8jgydiLf9-nxnp-z_s789Q1eSPPmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:22:56 -0500
From:	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>,
	Van Jacobson <vanj@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: remove a bogus TSO split

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 09:15 -0500, Neal Cardwell wrote:
>
>> Seems like a nice improvement, but if we apply this patch then AFAICT
>> to get the Nagle-enabled case right we also have to update
>> tcp_minshall_update() to notice these new non-MSS-aligned segments
>> going out, and count those as non-full-size segments for the
>> minshall-nagle check (to ensure we have no more than one outstanding
>> un-ACKed sub-MSS packet). Maybe something like (please excuse the
>> formatting):
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
>> index 70e55d2..a2ec237 100644
>> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
>> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
>> @@ -980,7 +980,8 @@ bool tcp_is_cwnd_limited(const struct sock *sk,
>> u32 in_flight);
>>  static inline void tcp_minshall_update(struct tcp_sock *tp, unsigned int mss,
>>                                        const struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  {
>> -       if (skb->len < mss)
>> +       if (skb->len < mss ||
>> +           tcp_skb_pcount(skb) * tcp_skb_mss(skb) > skb->len)
>>                 tp->snd_sml = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
>>  }
>
> Very good point Neal, but dont you think tcp_skb_mss(skb) is equal to
> mss at this point ? (We normally have synced with tso_segs =
> tcp_init_tso_segs(sk, skb, mss_now);)
>
> (Just trying to make this code more understandable...)
>
> Also I think we should move this helper out of include/net/tcp.h, we
> only use it from tcp_output.c
>
> I'll submit a v2, rewording the comment in front of
> tcp_mss_split_point()

Yes, I like your ideas to use mss_now instead, move
tcp_minshall_update() to tcp_output.c (next to tcp_minshall_check()?),
and update the comment in front of tcp_mss_split_point().

And given that mss_now is more sane than tcp_skb_mss(skb) (which is
zero for one-MSS skbs) I think maybe we can make it something like:

 static inline void tcp_minshall_update(struct tcp_sock *tp, unsigned
int mss_now,
                                       const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
         if (skb->len < tcp_skb_pcount(skb) * mss_now)
                tp->snd_sml = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
 }

neal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html