lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386952124.19078.148.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:28:44 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: sit tunnel slow since added GSO/TSO support

On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 17:13 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've been experimenting with IPIP and SIT tunnels. Both of them
> had the support for GSO/TSO added recently, by commits:
>   cb32f511a7 "ipip: add GSO/TSO support"
>   61c1db7fae "ipv6: sit: add GSO/TSO support"
> 
> IPIP works fine for me.
> 
> I am seeing very low TCP performance with SIT if TSO is enabled on the
> SIT interface. It does not matter if the underlying hardware supports
> NETIF_F_GSO_SIT or not (I have tested with bnx2x and tg3).

Strange, my tests were done on bnx2x, and TSO was definitely working ...

I'll take a look, thanks !


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ