[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28416.1386973562@death.nxdomain>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:26:02 -0800
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] bonding: add port protection for bond_3ad_xxx_change()
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> wrote:
>Jay Vosburgh said that the bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed and
>bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed is called with RTNL only, and
>the functions will modify the port's information with no further
>locking, they will not mutex against bond state machine and
>incoming LACPDU which do not hold RTNL, So I add port lock to
>protect the port information.
>
>But they are not critical bugs, they exist since day one, and till
>now they have never been hit and reported, because change for speed
>and duplex is very rare, and will not occur critical problem.
>
>The comments in the function is very old, cleanup the comments together.
For entire series:
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
-J
>Ding Tianhong (3):
> bonding: protect port for bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed()
> bonding: protect port for bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed()
> bonding: protect port for bond_3ad_handle_link_change()
>
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>--
>1.8.0
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists