[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131215.203158.557626779911420893.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:31:58 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hkchu@...gle.com
Cc: hannes@...essinduktion.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net-ipv6: Fix alleged compiler warning in
ipv6_exthdrs_len()
From: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkchu@...gle.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:19:07 -0800
> From: Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>
>
> It was reported that Commit 299603e8370a93dd5d8e8d800f0dff1ce2c53d36
> ("net-gro: Prepare GRO stack for the upcoming tunneling support")
> triggered a compiler warning in ipv6_exthdrs_len():
>
> net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c: In function ‘ipv6_gro_complete’:
> net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:178:24: warning: ‘optlen’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-u
> opth = (void *)opth + optlen;
> ^
> net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:164:22: note: ‘optlen’ was declared here
> int len = 0, proto, optlen;
> ^
> Note that there was no real bug here - optlen was never uninitialized
> before use. (Was the version of gcc I used smarter to not complain?)
>
> Reported-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Signed-off-by: H.K. Jerry Chu <hkchu@...gle.com>
What is this patch against?
It gets rejects when I try to apply it both with Hannes's patch reverted
and without it reverted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists