[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B1635D.7020205@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:57:01 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
<joe@...ches.com>, <vfalico@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: neighbour: add neighbour dead check for neigh_timer_handler()
On 2013/12/18 16:41, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:19:43PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> 0xffffffff812f8e29 <neigh_timer_handler+265>: mov 0xe8(%rbx),%rax
>> 0xffffffff812f8e30 <neigh_timer_handler+272>: mov %rbp,%rsi
>> 0xffffffff812f8e33 <neigh_timer_handler+275>: mov %rbx,%rdi
>> 0xffffffff812f8e36 <neigh_timer_handler+278>: callq *0x8(%rax) <-----crash
>> /usr/src/linux/net/core/neighbour.c: 877
>> 0xffffffff812f8e39 <neigh_timer_handler+281>: lea 0x3c(%rbx),%rax
>
> For me it looks like this:
>
> %rax is neigh->ops and the function pointer solicit is NULL and causes the the
> page fault.
>
>
yes, it is. So I was trying to find the situation that may free the neighbour when
the timer is running, but I could not yet.
Regards
Ding
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists