| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <52B1611E.4090608@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:47:26 +0800 From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ding Tianhong <dthxman@...il.com> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] slight optimization of addr compare for some modules On 2013/12/17 9:58, Ding Tianhong wrote: > On 2013/12/17 1:25, Joe Perches wrote: >> Hi again Ding. >> >> These should still be inspected for appropriate use of >> ether_addr_equal or ether_addr_equal_unaligned, but a >> better cocci input sp-file is: >> >> $ cat ether_addr_equal_unaligned.cocci >> @@ >> expression e1; >> expression e2; >> @@ >> >> - !memcmp(e1, e2, \(6\|ETH_ALEN\)) >> + ether_addr_equal_unaligned(e1, e2) >> >> @@ >> expression e1; >> expression e2; >> @@ >> >> - memcmp(e1, e2, \(6\|ETH_ALEN\)) == 0 >> + ether_addr_equal_unaligned(e1, e2) >> >> @@ >> expression e1; >> expression e2; >> @@ >> >> - memcmp(e1, e2, \(6\|ETH_ALEN\)) >> + !ether_addr_equal_unaligned(e1, e2) >> >> @@ >> expression e1; >> expression e2; >> @@ >> >> - memcmp(e1, e2, \(6\|ETH_ALEN\)) != 0 >> + !ether_addr_equal_unaligned(e1, e2) >> >> >> > > great, thanks, I 'll try and test. > > Regards > ding > Hi Joe: There are too many places need to be changed, should I make it in one patch or several pathset, pls give me some advise. thanks Regards Ding >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists