[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B44B97.4060400@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:52:23 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: eric.dumazet@...il.com, Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net, gro: fix the truesize of all fragments
Hello.
On 20-12-2013 15:45, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> When the truesize of all fragments was calculated, it didn't take
> the first small piece of data into account.
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 2b6b863..0665bd6 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -3027,9 +3027,12 @@ int skb_gro_receive(struct sk_buff **head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> frag->page_offset += offset;
> skb_frag_size_sub(frag, offset);
>
> - /* all fragments truesize : remove (head size + sk_buff) */
> + /**
Why kernel-doc style comment here? Networking code uses the following
comment style:
/* bla
* bla
*/
> + * all fragments truesize :
> + * remove (head size + sk_buff + offset)
> + */
> delta_truesize = skb->truesize -
> - SKB_TRUESIZE(skb_end_offset(skb));
> + SKB_TRUESIZE(skb_end_offset(skb) + offset);
>
> skb->truesize -= skb->data_len;
> skb->len -= skb->data_len;
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists