lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEH94LhiQGG-_Ad-5KYKt20CBYkQ6YR+s93zPeELzR-fGZ4yTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:59:59 +0800
From:	Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net, gro: fix the truesize of all fragments

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> On 20-12-2013 15:45, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>
>> When the truesize of all fragments was calculated, it didn't take
>> the first small piece of data into account.
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   net/core/skbuff.c |   10 +++++++---
>>   1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index 2b6b863..0665bd6 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -3027,9 +3027,12 @@ int skb_gro_receive(struct sk_buff **head, struct
>> sk_buff *skb)
>>                 frag->page_offset += offset;
>>                 skb_frag_size_sub(frag, offset);
>>
>> -               /* all fragments truesize : remove (head size + sk_buff)
>> */
>> +               /**
>
>
>    Why kernel-doc style comment here? Networking code uses the following
> comment style:
>
> /* bla
>  * bla
>  */
No, If you check other comments in networking code, you will see why i
did as that.

/**
 *    skb_segment - Perform protocol segmentation on skb.
 *    @skb: buffer to segment
 *    @features: features for the output path (see dev->features)
 *
 *    This function performs segmentation on the given skb.  It returns
 *    a pointer to the first in a list of new skbs for the segments.
 *    In case of error it returns ERR_PTR(err).
 */
struct sk_buff *skb_segment


>
>
>> +                * all fragments truesize :
>> +                * remove (head size + sk_buff + offset)
>> +                */
>>                 delta_truesize = skb->truesize -
>> -                                SKB_TRUESIZE(skb_end_offset(skb));
>> +                                SKB_TRUESIZE(skb_end_offset(skb) +
>> offset);
>>
>>                 skb->truesize -= skb->data_len;
>>                 skb->len -= skb->data_len;
>
>
> WBR, Sergei
Sorry, what is WBR?

>



-- 
Regards,

Zhi Yong Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ