[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131220140014.GF32129@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:00:14 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv4: arp: Always update neighbour address when a gratuitous arp is received
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:41:12PM -0800, Salam Noureddine wrote:
> Gratuitous arp packets are useful in switchover scenarios to update
> client arp tables as quickly as possible. Currently, the mac address
> of a neighbour is only updated after a locktime period has elapsed
> since the last update. In most use cases such delays are unacceptable
> for network admins. Moreover, the "updated" field of the neighbour
> stucture doesn't record the last time the address of a neighbour
> changed but records any change that happens to theneighbour. This is
> clearly a bug since locktime uses that field as meaning "addr_updated".
> With this observation, I was able to perpetuate a stale address by
> sending a stream of gratuitous arp packets spaced less than locktime
> apart.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/arp.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> index 7808093..ab13347 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
> @@ -910,7 +910,10 @@ static int arp_process(struct sk_buff *skb)
> agents are active. Taking the first reply prevents
> arp trashing and chooses the fastest router.
> */
> - override = time_after(jiffies, n->updated + n->parms->locktime);
> + override = time_after(jiffies,
> + n->updated + n->parms->locktime) ||
> + (tip == sip &&
> + inet_addr_type(net, sip) == RTN_UNICAST);
>
> /* Broadcast replies and request packets
> do not assert neighbour reachability.
Hm, that is hard to decipher in a few months (or years). Maybe a small
function like
static bool is_garp(...)
{
...
}
would self-document the code. They normally get inlined so there is no
additional runtime overhead.
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists