[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUQ3iaq+X+CngqJCGWq5Ep_XhcfWEKqrCQcZ3iC6Uz_qA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:11:25 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net_sched: fix a regression in tcf_proto_lookup_ops()
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> list_for_each_entry(t, &tcf_proto_base, head) doesn't
> exit with t = NULL if we reached the end of the list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Fixes: 3627287463b4 ("net_sched: convert tcf_proto_ops to use struct
> list_head")
> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> ---
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
The bug you reported to me yesterday is in mirred action module cleanup,
so how is it possible to be fixed in cls_api.c? It should be act_api.c.
If you meant to fix a different bug, please include the backtrace in the log?
Your patch looks good generally, but actually I doubt we need to check for
an existing ops when unregistering, since we almost for sure only unregister
existing ones as they are all static allocated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists