[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpU_G5oxNf5XD06rko9+Vc1dHvxw-Qm2BRBp7kxqGcBp-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:49:27 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net_sched: fix a regression in tc actions
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 07:15 -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>> On 12/20/13 03:08, Cong Wang wrote:
>> > This patch fixes:
>> > 1) pass mask rather than size to tcf_hashinfo_init()
>> > 2) the cleanup should be in reversed order in mirred_cleanup_module()
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> > Fixes: 369ba56787d7469c0afd ("net_sched: init struct tcf_hashinfo at register time")
>> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> >
>>
>> Please Cc me - my filters will catch it faster.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
> This doesn't fix the issue, as I said earlier
When did I say I fixed it? :) Below is what I said:
> I just sent a fix for the problem I see, not sure it fixes
> the bug you reported too.
>
> I will test it as a module tomorrow, if you don't send a fix
> before that.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists