[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131220140617.09a672f7@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:06:17 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv4: arp: Always update neighbour address when a
gratuitous arp is received
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:59:22 -0800
Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com> wrote:
> Gratuitous arp packets are useful in switchover scenarios to update
> client arp tables as quickly as possible. Currently, the mac address
> of a neighbour is only updated after a locktime period has elapsed
> since the last update. In most use cases such delays are unacceptable
> for network admins. Moreover, the "updated" field of the neighbour
> stucture doesn't record the last time the address of a neighbour
> changed but records any change that happens to the neighbour. This is
> clearly a bug since locktime uses that field as meaning "addr_updated".
> With this observation, I was able to perpetuate a stale address by
> sending a stream of gratuitous arp packets spaced less than locktime
> apart.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
Doesn't this make the system more vulnerable to ARP spoofing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists