netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] bonding: add option lp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:06:03 -0800
From:	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] bonding: add option lp_interval for loading module

On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:10 PM, Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> wrote:

> @@ -4271,6 +4276,12 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
> 		fail_over_mac_value = BOND_FOM_NONE;
> 	}
> 
> +	if (lp_interval == 0) {
> +		pr_warning("Warning: ip_interval must be between 1 and %d, so it was reset to %d\n",
> +			INT_MAX, BOND_ALB_DEFAULT_LP_INTERVAL);
> +		lp_interval = BOND_ALB_DEFAULT_LP_INTERVAL;
> +	}
> +

[sorry, replied with wrong email]

What do you think about using the new bond_option_xxx_set() functions for module parameters also?  The above code, for example, is duplicated in bond_option_lp_interval_set().  This way, we have a unified solution, where option bounds checking, compatibility, warnings, etc happened in one place for all three modes of input: sysfs, netlink, and module params.

-scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html