netdev - Re: inconsistency of ethtool feature names for get vs. set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZOPZJZVH-ajrytOT9u70s4rK+n38ssDvEz9zEc0NQn2zywOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jan 2014 22:12:55 +0200
From:	Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: inconsistency of ethtool feature names for get vs. set

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:

> Just to be clear, I do see that there's a problem here but the fix may
> have to be mostly or entirely in documentation rather than code.

Ben, I am fine with at least starting with documenting this and see
where it takes us, can you pick it up?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html