netdev - Re: How to test netfilter SYNPROXY target properly?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:24:15 -0800
From:	Vincent Li <vincent.mc.li@...il.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to test netfilter SYNPROXY target properly?

Thanks Patrick, put SYNPROXY in FORWARD did it.

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:30:21PM -0800, Vincent Li wrote:
>> Hi Patrick
>>
>> I should have put this question in user list instead of dev list, but
>> I couldn't find any user based documentation on how to test the
>> SYNPROXY target other than the message in the SYNPROXY patch series.
>> so here is my setup:
>>
>> ---packet flow
>>
>> client 10.1.72.99 (vlan 1101)  <->Linux with SYNPROXY rule - 10.1.72.9
>> (vlan 1101) 10.2.72.139 (vlan 1102) <->server 10.2.72.99
>> ...
>> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i $EXTIF -p tcp --dport 80 -m state
>> --state UNTRACKED,INVALID -j SYNPROXY --sack-perm --timestamp --mss
>> 1460 --wscale 5
>> 00000000        00000000
>>
>> I think I might miss something and not testing the SYNPROXY properly, any clue?
>
> I guess you need to put the SYNPROXY rule in FORWARD instead of INPUT.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html