lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140103131908.GA26268@macbook.localnet>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:19:08 +0000
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Vincent Li <vincent.mc.li@...il.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to test netfilter SYNPROXY target properly?

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:30:21PM -0800, Vincent Li wrote:
> Hi Patrick
> 
> I should have put this question in user list instead of dev list, but
> I couldn't find any user based documentation on how to test the
> SYNPROXY target other than the message in the SYNPROXY patch series.
> so here is my setup:
> 
> ---packet flow
> 
> client 10.1.72.99 (vlan 1101)  <->Linux with SYNPROXY rule - 10.1.72.9
> (vlan 1101) 10.2.72.139 (vlan 1102) <->server 10.2.72.99
> ...
> /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i $EXTIF -p tcp --dport 80 -m state
> --state UNTRACKED,INVALID -j SYNPROXY --sack-perm --timestamp --mss
> 1460 --wscale 5
> 00000000        00000000
> 
> I think I might miss something and not testing the SYNPROXY properly, any clue?

I guess you need to put the SYNPROXY rule in FORWARD instead of INPUT.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ