[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1388726884.2527.4.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:28:04 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v2 03/11] ixgbe: Use static inlines instead of macros
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 21:18 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.h
[]
> @@ -124,22 +124,31 @@ s32 ixgbe_reset_pipeline_82599(struct ixgbe_hw *hw);
> #ifndef writeq
> #define writeq(val, addr) writel((u32) (val), addr); \
> writel((u32) (val >> 32), (addr + 4));
> #endif
This is unchanged, but it would be nicer with a do {} while.
#ifndef writeq
#define writeq(val, addr) \
do { \
writel((u32)(val), addr); \
writel((u32)((val) >> 32), (addr + 4)); \
} while (0)
Even then, this could be nicer as an inline too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists