[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CA11FE.1090608@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:16:30 +0800
From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@...wei.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kaber@...sh.net>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<honkiko@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/4] veth: backup classid befor switch net_ns
On 2014/1/3 18:45, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 03-01-2014 7:11, Libo Chen wrote:
>
>> dev_forward_skb will clear skb->sk, so we need save classid
>> before that, otherwise the skb can not be under control by
>> net_cls.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/veth.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
>> index 2ec2041..ce43a2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> [...]
>> @@ -123,6 +124,12 @@ static netdev_tx_t veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>> rcv->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
>> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>>
>> + /**
>
> Why you're using kernel-doc style comments out of place? The format of multi-line comments in the networking code is this:
>
> /* bla
> * bla
> */
thank you
Libo
>
>> + * dev_forward_sbk will clear skb->sk, so save
>> + * skb->sk->sk_classid for Qos
>> + */
>> + bk_cls_classid(skb);
>> +
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists