[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANaxB-w0-ErUvrEiGmG7dxV-dBwnYX3eX8rE0NQ=boKbc6HU8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:39:14 +0400
From: Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, vvs@...nvz.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: release conntrack from rcu callback
Hi Florian,
2014/1/7 Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>:
> Andrew Vagin <avagin@...il.com> wrote:
>> > ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
>> > if (unlikely(nf_ct_is_dying(ct) ||
>> > !atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)))
>> > // which means we should hit this path (0 ref).
>> > h = NULL;
>> > else {
>> > // otherwise, it cannot go away from under us, since
>> > // we own a reference now.
>> > if (unlikely(!nf_ct_tuple_equal(tuple, &h->tuple) ||
>> > nf_ct_zone(ct) != zone)) {
>
> Perhaps this needs additional !nf_ct_is_confirmed()?
Yes, it think it must help. Thank you for the comments. I resent this patch:
[PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get
>
> It would cover your case (found a recycled element that has been put on
> the unconfirmed list (refcnt already set to 1, ct->tuple is set) on another cpu,
> extensions possibly not yet fully initialised), and the same tuple).
>
> Regards,
> Florian
Thanks,
Andrey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists