| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140107111807.38624f74@rainbow.cbg.collabora.co.uk> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:18:07 +0000 From: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk> To: Andrew Collins <bsderandrew@...il.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, Brad Johnson <bjohnson@...ssa.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Possible to add netfilter hooks to IFB driver? On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:51:37 -0700 Andrew Collins <bsderandrew@...il.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Stephen Hemminger > <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote: > > > > The risk is creating the same races that made IMQ unacceptable. > > -- > > I believe openwrt nowadays uses a TC action which runs the packet > through prerouting then pulls in the mark off the ct entry into the > skb, so ingress+IFB can take action on it. Thanks for the info. I guess the implementation is this one: https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/generic/patches-3.12/621-sched_act_connmark.patch https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/package/network/utils/iproute2/patches/210-add-act_connmark.patch https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/package/network/config/qos-scripts/files/usr/lib/qos/generate.sh#L343 > Perhaps a cleaned up version of this would be suitable for upstream? I don't know but this seems a useful feature to me. Best regards, Alban -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists