[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CD0331.8040204@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 15:50:09 +0800
From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To: chenweilong <chenweilong@...wei.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kumaran.4353@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: don't call addrconf_dst_alloc again when enable
lo
On 01/03/2014 02:53 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 05:33:15PM +0800, chenweilong wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> index 62d1799..d2f8c0a 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> @@ -2422,8 +2422,9 @@ static void init_loopback(struct net_device *dev)
>> if (sp_ifa->flags & (IFA_F_DADFAILED | IFA_F_TENTATIVE))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (sp_ifa->rt)
>> - continue;
>> + if (sp_ifa->rt && sp_ifa->rt->dst.dev == dev) {
>> + ip6_del_rt(sp_ifa->rt);
>> + }
>>
>> sp_rt = addrconf_dst_alloc(idev, &sp_ifa->addr, 0);
>>
>
> Maybe this change would not be that bad after all, as those ifa attached dsts
> are already dead and queued up for gc and should not get inserted back.
I like this idea, maybe the below patch is better. we only need to delete this
route when it has been added to garbage list.
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 1a341f7..4dca886 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -2610,8 +2610,16 @@ static void init_loopback(struct net_device *dev)
if (sp_ifa->flags & (IFA_F_DADFAILED | IFA_F_TENTATIVE))
continue;
- if (sp_ifa->rt)
- continue;
+ if (sp_ifa->rt) {
+ /* This dst has been added to garbage list when
+ * lo device down, delete this obsolete dst and
+ * reallocate new router for ifa. */
+ if (sp_ifa->rt->dst.obsolete > 0) {
+ ip6_del_rt(sp_ifa->rt);
+ sp_ifa->rt = NULL;
+ } else
+ continue;
+ }
sp_rt = addrconf_dst_alloc(idev, &sp_ifa->addr, false);
>
> I'll try to just disable routes without removing them at all when we set an
> interface to down at the weekend.
>
How do you decide which route should be disabled? use rt6_flags? I don't know
if your way will cause miscarriage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists