[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1389302590.2025.55.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:23:10 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<gospo@...hat.com>, <sassmann@...hat.com>,
<mitch.a.williams@...el.com>, <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 05/15] i40e: add a comment on barrier and fix panic
on reset
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 21:21 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:12 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:17:35 -0800
> >
> > > Yes, it's apparent that two different internal patches were compressed
> > > together. If its unacceptable to do this then I'll speak to Jeff about
> > > splitting them.
> >
> > I won't reject the entire pull request on account of this, but please
> > don't do this in the future.
>
> I don't understand this. You don't want to see patches that are known
> to introduce regressions, and you expect people to squash together known
> buggy patches with their subsequent fix-ups before submitting.
[...]
Hmm, looking at this again, I suppose it is just this particular
combination of two unrelated changes you're objecting to?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists