[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140113221504.GM6586@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:15:04 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, fweimer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] path mtu hardening patches
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:03:56PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> I really don't like to depend on firewalling to do that. Especially on
> big routers one can use the routing table to protect interfaces for
> management and thus don't need to introduce stateful firewalling to
> realize a secure router setup which could cause performance degradation,
> especially with lots of small and shortlived flows (e.g. UDP/DNS).
This may get better if maybe some work is put into bringing this patch
forward: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/268758
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists