[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140114171740.GB1867@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 18:17:40 +0100
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: [RFC] sysfs_rename_link() and its usage
Hi,
I'm hitting a strange issue and/or I'm completely lost in sysfs internals.
Consider having two net_device *a, *b; which are registered normally.
Now, to create a link from /sys/class/net/a->name/linkname to b, one should
use:
sysfs_create_link(&(a->dev.kobj), &(b->dev.kobj), linkname);
To remove it, even simpler:
sysfs_remove_link(&(a->dev.kobj), linkname);
This works like a charm. However, if I want to use (obviously, with the
symlink present):
sysfs_rename_link(&(a->dev.kobj), &(b->dev.kobj), oldname, newname);
this fails with:
"sysfs: ns invalid in 'a->name' for 'oldname'"
in
608 struct sysfs_dirent *sysfs_find_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *parent_sd,
...
615 if (!!sysfs_ns_type(parent_sd) != !!ns) {
616 WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "sysfs: ns %s in '%s' for '%s'\n",
617 sysfs_ns_type(parent_sd) ? "required" : "invalid",
618 parent_sd->s_name, name);
619 return NULL;
620 }
Code path:
warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
sysfs_get_dirent_ns+0x30/0x80
sysfs_find_dirent+0x84/0x110
sysfs_get_dirent_ns+0x3e/0x80
sysfs_rename_link_ns+0x54/0xd0
I have no idea what this code means. Is there any reason for it to
fail (i.e. am I doing something wrong?) or I've hit a bug?
I've tested the only user of it (bridge) - and it works fine, however it's
not using its own net_device's kobject but rather its own dir.
Thank you!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists