[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140115025900.GB1554@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:59:00 +0100
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: rename sysfs symlinks on device
name change
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:50:30AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>On 2014/1/15 4:58, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
...snip...
>> +void netdev_adjacent_rename_links(struct net_device *dev, char *oldname)
>> +{
>> + struct netdev_adjacent *iter;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &dev->adj_list.upper, list) {
>> + netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(iter->dev, oldname,
>> + &iter->dev->adj_list.lower);
>> + netdev_adjacent_sysfs_add(iter->dev, dev,
>> + &iter->dev->adj_list.lower);
>> + }
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &dev->adj_list.lower, list) {
>> + netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(iter->dev, oldname,
>> + &iter->dev->adj_list.upper);
>> + netdev_adjacent_sysfs_add(iter->dev, dev,
>> + &iter->dev->adj_list.upper);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>
>why no all_adj_list, only adj_list?
>
>I think you have add the dev to the upper_dev's upper_dev by all_adj_list, and lower_dev, so you have to check them.
symlinks are created only for neighbour adjacent devices, which are in
adj_list.*, and are not created for all_adj_list.* devices, which contains
a 'full view' list of all adjacent devices.
>
>Regards
>Ding
>
>> void *netdev_lower_dev_get_private(struct net_device *dev,
>> struct net_device *lower_dev)
>> {
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists